The fruitful death of modal collapse arguments

Modal collapse arguments are all the rage in certain philosophical circles as of late. The purport to show that classical theism entails absurdly fatalistic conclusion everything exists necessarily. My first aim this paper is bold: put an end action-based modal against theism. To accomplish this, I articulate ‘Simple Collapse Argument’ and then characterize defend Tomaszewski’s criticism thereof. Second, critically examine Mullins’ new argument formulated response aforementioned criticism. argue does not succeed. Third, a powers-based has received much less attention literature. Fourth, why God’s being purely actual, well identical each acts, simply cannot entail given indeterministic causation. This, take it, signals death arguments. But hope lost for proponents arguments—for fruitful one insofar it paves way inquiry into at least two potential problems Showing my paper’s second aim.